Trial reportBMC psychology2026
The efficacy of three types of gratitude interventions for promoting defending behavior in response to school bullying among Chinese early adolescents.
Trial report in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to examine the association between gratitude and defending behavior in response to school bullying among Chinese early adolescents and to evaluate the effects of three types of interventions (i.e., gratitude curriculum, gratitude journal, and gratitude visits) on gratitude and defending behavior.
methodsTwo studies were conducted. Study 1 employed a cross-sectional survey involving 912 seventh- and eighth-grade students from two schools (52.41% girls, 53.62% seventh-grade students, 12–18-year-olds). Study 2 involved the development of a gratitude curriculum and employed a four-armed randomized controlled trial with 16 classes, in which adolescents were randomly assigned to a gratitude curriculum intervention, a gratitude journal intervention, a gratitude visit intervention, or a control condition.
resultsThe results indicated that gratitude was positively associated with defending behavior in school bullying. In addition, both the gratitude curriculum and the gratitude journal significantly increased adolescents’ gratitude from pre- to postintervention and resulted in higher postintervention levels than the control group, whereas gratitude visits did not significantly enhance gratitude. Similarly, the gratitude curriculum and the gratitude journal significantly improved defending behavior both from pre- to postintervention and relative to the control group, whereas gratitude visits led to significant improvements in defending behavior only from pre- to postintervention. Furthermore, no significant postintervention differences in gratitude or defending behavior were observed among the three intervention groups.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence that gratitude is associated with defending behavior in school bullying contexts, highlighting its potential relevance for school-based anti-bullying interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.