Trial reportBMC psychology2026
A multidisciplinary intervention targeting pragmatic language and maternal flexibility in Egyptian children with oppositional defiant disorder.
Trial report in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) is a multifaceted behavioral condition with a growing theoretical and empirical foundation regarding its etiology, risk factors, comorbidities, and developmental trajectories. This complexity necessitates integrated management strategies that simultaneously address co-occurring domains, such as child pragmatic language deficits and maternal psychological inflexibility, beyond the scope of conventional interventions like standard Parent Management Training (PMT). This study aims to determine the outcome of an intervention program that targeted pragmatic skills in children with ODD and their mothers’ psychological flexibility.
methodsA sample of 100 children with ODD was recruited from the Child Psychiatry Clinic and assessed for co-occurring pragmatic language disorders using the Egyptian Arabic Pragmatics Language Test (EAPLT). Of these, 60 children exhibiting pragmatic deficits were randomly assigned to either Group I, which received the intervention program, or group II, which did not (30 per Group). Both groups were assessed twice, before and after the application of the intervention program, using EAPLT for children, the Maternal Psychological Flexibility Scale (MPFS) for mothers, and the ODD Scale (parents’ form). A third assessment was conducted as a follow-up after one and a half months to examine the longevity of the outcome.
resultsThe participants in Group I, children and their mothers, showed significantly higher total pragmatic scores and maternal psychological flexibility scores than those in Group II. This improvement led to a decrease in the severity of ODD, as indicated by the ODD scale score among participants in Group I. The positive outcome of the intervention program remained evident for up to one and a half months following the completion of the rehabilitation program.
conclusionsImplementing this intervention program for children who experience comorbidity between language disorders and emotional/behavioral disorders is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.