ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Symptom burden and patient characteristics in specialist palliative care: a descriptive analysis.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Germany, specialist palliative care (SPC) is provided by palliative care units (PCU), hospital-based palliative care advisory (PCA) teams, and specialist palliative home care (SPHC) teams. Systematic cross-setting comparisons are lacking. Such comparisons are essential to identify setting-specific patient needs and differences and to inform tailoring of care structures, resource allocation, and training to setting-specific needs. We therefore aim to compare settings regarding patient characteristics, symptom/problem burden, functional status, and palliative care phase.
methodsSecondary analysis of a prospective, cross-sectional, multi-centre study including 3,115 care episodes (PCU: 753; PCA: 1,568; SPHC: 794) across 29 SPC services. Data collection included symptom/problem burden using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS), functional status by Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS), and Palliative Care Phase. Presence of symptoms was defined as any IPOS item ≥ moderate, sometimes or partly addressed.
resultsPatients had a mean age of 72 years, 51% were female, and 73% had cancer. Weakness (78–90%) and poor mobility (71–85%) were most frequent across all settings. Pain (54%) and poor appetite (63%) were most pronounced in SPHC, while anxiety (61%) dominated in PCA. Median IPOS sum scores were highest in SPHC (24), followed by PCA (22) and PCU (21). Median AKPS scores were overall low, with 30 in inpatient settings and 40 in SPHC, reflecting significant functional impairment. Palliative care phases varied significantly (p < .001), with the unstable phase predominant in PCU (43%) and PCA (34%), and the stable phase in SPHC (43%), on admission. High rates of “cannot assess” responses, especially in psychosocial and practical domains, influenced prevalence estimates.
conclusionsPatients in German SPC experience substantial symptom burden and diverse care needs, varying by setting. The findings highlight the necessity for setting-tailored assessment tools, specialized training, and systemic development to improve care quality and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.