ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of patella baja after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatella baja(PB) is a recognized radiographic finding after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), yet its incidence, predictors, and clinical relevance remain debated. Differentiating true from pseudo PB may provide additional radiographic insight into postoperative patellar inferiorization and may help clarify whether different mechanisms of patellar inferiorization translate into clinically meaningful outcomes.
methodsA total of 178 patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of five years. Patellar height was assessed using the Insall–Salvati Index (ISI), modified ISI, Caton–Deschamps Index (CDI), and Blackburne–Peel Index (BBP). True PB was defined as ISI < 0.8, whereas pseudo PB was defined as CDI < 0.6 or BBP < 0.54 with ISI ≥ 0.8. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of PB, with model discrimination and calibration assessed.
resultsPostoperative PB was identified in 61 of 178 patients (34.3%), including 33 true and 28 pseudo cases. Among patients with paired radiographs (162 patients), 32.9% developed new-onset PB despite normal preoperative indices. Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between patients with and without PB. Greater patellar inferiorization showed weak correlations with anterior knee pain and WOMAC scores. Lower preoperative ISI was independently associated with true PB, whereas lower preoperative CDI and BBP values were associated with pseudo PB. Younger age was independently associated with the development of any postoperative PB.
conclusionPB was a common radiographic finding after primary TKA but was not associated with long-term functional outcomes when classified dichotomously. Preoperative patellar height indices were associated with the development of postoperative PB and may help identify patients at increased radiographic risk. Further studies incorporating direct joint-line measurements are needed to clarify the clinical significance of postoperative patellar inferiorization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.