Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668059›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions towards premarital screening among undergraduate university students in Chattogram district, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.

Delwar Hossain, Mohammed Mohsin, Sadia Tasnuva Jahan, Bibi Salma, Nusrat Jahan, Anupam Barua, Mohammed Aktar Sayeed, Md Mayin Uddin Hasan, Mohammad Injamul Hoq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Delwar Hossain *Department of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Chittagong, Kumira, Chittagong, Chittagong-4318, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6650-7314
Mohammed Mohsin *Department of Public Health, University of Creative Technology, Chittagong, Chittagong-4212, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7159-5806
Sadia Tasnuva Jahan *Department of Public Health, University of Creative Technology, Chittagong, Chittagong-4212, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2920-2610
Bibi SalmaDepartment of Public Health, University of Creative Technology, Chittagong, Chittagong-4212, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7992-2878
Nusrat JahanDepartment of Public Health, University of Creative Technology, Chittagong, Chittagong-4212, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6858-413X
Anupam BaruaDepartment of Public Health, University of Creative Technology, Chittagong, Chittagong-4212, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5580-9898
Mohammed Aktar SayeedDepartment of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Chittagong, Kumira, Chittagong, Chittagong-4318, Bangladesh.
Md Mayin Uddin HasanDepartment of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Chittagong, Kumira, Chittagong, Chittagong-4318, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-6569
Mohammad Injamul HoqDepartment of Public Health, University of Creative Technology, Chittagong, Chittagong-4212, Bangladesh. injamul@uctc.edu.bd.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7408-1147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPremarital screening (PMS) programs are a crucial measure to prevent hereditary and sexually transmitted diseases, particularly in communities with high consanguinity levels and genetic disorder prevalence. Premarital training is not well-researched in Bangladesh, where thalassemia and hemoglobinopathies are endemic. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and perception (KAP) regarding PMS among undergraduate students in southeastern Bangladesh.

methodsAn analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 844 undergraduate students from four universities in Chattogram, Bangladesh. A multistage cluster sampling method was used to recruit participants from science, business, and humanities disciplines. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire, which assessed sociodemographic characteristics and KAP towards PMS. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using STATA SE 18. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsOut of 844 students, only 22.5% students had a good knowledge, while attitudes (89.2%) and perceptions (95.7%) toward PMS were highly positive. In multivariate analysis, science students were significantly more likely to have good knowledge than humanities students (AOR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.14-2.45; p = 0.009). Conversely, females (AOR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.43-0.87; p = 0.006) and those with consanguineous parents (AOR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.42-0.99; p = 0.043) were less likely to demonstrate good knowledge. No significant associations were observed between age group, academic year, family history of hereditary disease, and attitudes after adjustment for factors.

conclusionUndergraduate students in southeastern Bangladesh exhibited poor knowledge but positive attitudes and perceptions toward PMS. Incorporation of premarital training modules into university curricula, as well as media- and community-based programs, may increase knowledge and promote preventive health behaviors.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePremarital ExaminationsStudentsAdolescentAdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultAttitudesBangladeshKnowledgePerceptionsPremarital screeningUndergraduate students

Identifiers

PMID41668059
PMCPMC12930697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.