Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668032›Full record

ReviewBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Two rare intra-articsular knee disorders with overlapping symptoms: separate case reports of tenosynovial giant cell tumour and lipoma arborescens and literature review.

Heqiang Chen, Xu Yang, Sihai Liu

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heqiang ChenDepartment of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Fourth Hospital, Wuhan, 430033, China.
Xu YangDepartment of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Fourth Hospital, Wuhan, 430033, China.
Sihai LiuDepartment of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Fourth Hospital, Wuhan, 430033, China. sihai.liu1@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) and lipoma arborescens (LA) are both rare intra-articular lesions of the knee. Despite their distinct pathological nature, they often present with similar clinical manifestations such as joint swelling, pain, and limited motion, which makes differential diagnosis challenging. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two patients who presented with progressive knee swelling and discomfort and were admitted within the same clinical session, offering a unique opportunity for direct comparison. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed intra-articular soft-tissue masses in both cases. Both patients underwent arthroscopic synovectomy, with histopathological examination confirming the diagnosis of TGCT in one case and revealing the characteristic villous proliferation of adipose tissue within the synovium diagnostic of LA in the other. Both patients underwent surgical resection and experienced significant improvement in symptoms during follow-up.

conclusionAlthough uncommon, TGCT and LA should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained knee joint swelling or effusion. MRI provides valuable clues, but definitive diagnosis relies on histopathological confirmation. Awareness of these rare conditions may help avoid misdiagnosis and guide appropriate management.

Indexed as

Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon SheathKnee JointLipomaAdolescentAdultArthroscopyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSynovectomySynovial MembraneArthroscopic synovectomyLipoma arborescensMagnetic resonance imagingTenosynovial giant cell tumour

Identifiers

PMID41668032
PMCPMC12930574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.