Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41668030›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026

Beyond prescription medicine in pregnancy - raspberry leaf and other herbs in Australia.

Rebekah L Bowman, Deborah L Davis, Jan Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebekah L BowmanUniversity of Canberra, Canberra, Australia. beksbrew@gmail.com.
Deborah L DavisUniversity of Canberra and ACT Government, Health Directorate, Canberra, Australia.
Jan TaylorUniversity of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious surveys suggest women are taking a variety of herbs during their pregnancy. One herb that has been used for centuries for pregnancy is raspberry leaf (Rubus idaeus). There is a need to update our understanding of the motivations and experiences of women using raspberry leaf specifically during their pregnancy. This paper also sheds light on the current prevalence of herbal medicine use in pregnancy in Australia.

methodsA prospective cohort design, collecting data by survey and routinely collected clinical data, was implemented. This paper reports on the secondary aims, from a cross-sectional survey nested within this study, which provided both the prevalence of herbal use in pregnancy (n = 561) and women's motivations and experiences of using raspberry leaf specifically in pregnancy (n = 46).

findingsMost women (68%) reported taking one or more herbal medicine/s during their pregnancy. Raspberry leaf was the most common herb reported, with more than a third (37%) of the cohort reporting use of the herb. The most common reason for using raspberry leaf during pregnancy was to make labour easier. Most women claimed that taking raspberry leaf in pregnancy was a positive experience. Analysis of open text responses focusing on the experience of taking raspberry leaf, revealed four categories: Ritual, Comforting, Necessary, Self-Determined.

conclusionThis study identified a larger percentage of women taking herbal medicine in pregnancy than has been reported in older surveys in Australia. Raspberry leaf was considered a 'necessary' part of women's 'ritual' while pregnant that contributed to their 'self-determination.' Raspberry leaf is important to some women's personal preparation for labour.

Indexed as

PhytotherapyRubusAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPlant LeavesPregnancyProspective StudiesYoung AdultComplementary and alternative therapiesComplementary therapiesPregnancyPregnant womenRaspberry leaf

Identifiers

PMID41668030
PMCPMC12998036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.