ArticleBMC neurology2026
Development of a clinical nomogram to assess the risk of cognitive impairment in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCognitive impairment is a prevalent condition among middle-aged and older adults and often progresses to dementia, posing substantial clinical and societal burdens. Early assessment of high-risk individuals is essential for timely intervention and management. This study aimed to develop a practical nomogram for the assessment of cognitive impairment in community-dwelling elderly populations. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study recruited 581 participants between October 23 and November 8, 2023, comprising 465 assigned to the training cohort and 116 to the validation cohort. Demographic information, medical history, lifestyle, and biochemical parameters were collected using structured questionnaires. Cognitive impairment was assessed via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Independent features were identified using LASSO regression followed by binary logistic regression, and a nomogram was constructed based on these variables. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA).
resultsCognitive impairment prevalence was 38.5% in the training and 32.8% in the validation cohort. Six features—sex, age, systolic blood pressure, homocysteine, fruit consumption, and family history of stroke—were integrated into the nomogram. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.816 in training cohort; 0.796 in validation cohort) with satisfactory calibration and clinical applicability.
conclusionThe proposed nomogram provides a reliable and convenient tool for the early risk assessment of cognitive impairment in middle-aged and older adults, facilitating targeted prevention and personalized management in clinical and community settings. Its implementation may assist healthcare professionals in identifying high-risk individuals and mitigating progression toward dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.