ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Bilateral retinal implants for improving visual restoration: a simulated bionic vision study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degenerative diseases of the retina produce a severe deterioration in visual perception. Visual prostheses enable partial vision restoration by eliciting phosphenes (perceived spots of light) through electrical stimulation. By using augmented reality (AR) to simulate bionic vision (SBV), this study aims to provide insights on the potential benefits of bilateral retinal implants. While monocular implants have been extensively studied, research on binocular implants remains limited. Twenty-four volunteers participated in this study, and were divided into two groups, SBV-monocular and SBV-binocular groups; both experienced phosphene-based visual simulations of the scene using 120 phosphenes per implant. A control group perceived the scene directly through the cameras of the AR headset. Participants completed five tasks to assess their orientation, mobility, and pattern recognition capacities. SBV-binocular subjects outperformed in spatial perception and mobility tasks (p-value < 0.05), but not in pattern recognition tasks. All SBV groups perform significantly worse than the control group. The findings suggest that the bilateral implants’ enhanced field of view and stereoscopic depth cues afforded by bilateral implants were shown to support hand-eye coordination and spatial navigation tasks. However, relevant benefits were not demonstrated over monocular implants in detecting fine details in static tasks. This may be attributed to the absence of vergence control, the capacity to shift phosphene position in response to natural eye movements, in the bilateral configuration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.