ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Global research trends in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a visualized bibliometric analysis.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to characterise the global research landscape of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using bibliometric methods, by outlining temporal trends in publication output, key contributors and research themes, and identifying remaining evidence gaps. Publications on RAPN from 2001 to 2025 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, restricted to English-language articles and reviews. After screening titles and abstracts, 2,367 records were included (1,994 original articles and 373 reviews). Microsoft Excel was used to organise bibliographic information and generate time-trend plots. CiteSpace 6.3 and VOSviewer 1.6.17 were applied to construct collaboration and co-citation networks for countries/regions, institutions, authors, journals, keywords and references, and to perform clustering, timeline and burst-detection analyses. Annual RAPN publications were few in the early 2000s but increased steadily, entering a high-output phase in recent years and indicating that RAPN has become an important option in nephron-sparing surgery. Research activity was concentrated in a limited number of countries: the United States was the leading contributor, followed by Italy and China, with additional input from other European and Asian countries. A small group of high-volume tertiary and academic centres formed the institutional core of the field. Most articles were published in specialist urology journals, while leading general urology titles were the most frequently co-cited sources. Keywords were mainly related to partial nephrectomy, nephron-sparing surgery, surgical approach, outcomes and complications. Co-occurrence, clustering and timeline analyses showed that research focus has shifted from early feasibility and comparisons with open or laparoscopic surgery towards tumour complexity scoring, renal ischaemia and function preservation, oncologic outcomes, and the integration of three-dimensional reconstruction and image-guided or augmented reality–assisted RAPN. Global RAPN research has expanded rapidly over the past two decades and is largely driven by high-volume centres in North America and Europe, with growing participation from Asia. Existing evidence supports RAPN as a key component of nephron-sparing surgery, particularly for complex renal tumours, but robust prospective and multicentre data on long-term renal function, quality of life, cost-effectiveness and outcomes in less-resourced settings remain insufficient. Future studies should strengthen international collaboration, standardise functional and oncologic outcome reporting, and focus on risk-stratified comparisons and real-world cohorts to better define the indications and clinical value of RAPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41667898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.