ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2026
A Multi-parametric MRI and Machine Learning Study of Cerebellar Structure in Youth with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic condition caused by pathogenic variants of the NF1 gene. While alterations in cerebral structural and microstructural differences have been reported in NF1, the cerebellum remains largely unexplored. Since individuals with NF1 are at risk for cognitive difficulties, which are in turn associated with cerebellar processes, understanding the underlying neural mechanisms is critical for intervention development.
methodsYouth (5-16 years) with NF1 (n = 30) and unaffected youth (n = 40) participated in neuropsychological (i.e., neurocognitive, parent report of motor abilities) testing and MRI to ascertain structural cerebellar metrics, including volume and white matter mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), neurite density (NDI), and orientation dispersion (ODI). We used ANCOVAs to compare between-groups and support vector modeling to investigate which variables (imaging, neurocognitive, motor) contribute the most to NF1 and unaffected participants distinction.
resultsAfter controlling for total brain volume, white matter volume was larger in the NF1 versus unaffected group with a large effect (partial η²=0.57). Cerebellar MD was higher in the NF1 group, while FA, NDI and ODI were lower in the NF1 group (p's < 0.05). Support vector modeling correctly classified 90.20% of participants as being in the NF1 or unaffected group. Top three weights were white matter volume, mobility ratings, and NDI.
conclusionsDifferences in cerebellar white matter microstructure (compared to unaffected youth) were identified in NF1. Cerebellar white matter volume, NDI, and MD were particularly useful differentiators between NF1 and unaffected youth and may be underlying mechanisms of cerebellum-mediated neurocognitive deficits in NF1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.