ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Evaluation of robotic exposure among gynecological surgeons: results of survey from the young European advocates of robotic surgery (YEARS).
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- National survey of GERGIN-affiliated Spanish gynecologic robotic surgeons of the perceived clinical, educational and professional impact of robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of European regionwide and Japanese nationwide surveys on gynecologic robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary Expert Perspectives on a Conceptual Autonomous Mini Surgical Robot for Gynecological Procedures: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveTo identify factors associated with higher self-perceived confidence in performing robotic surgery among early-career gynecologic surgeons, and to assess satisfaction with current surgical activity among young consultants. A cross-sectional survey consisting of a 28-item online questionnaire was developed and disseminated through the social media channels of the Young European Advocates of Robotic Surgery (YEARS) and the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS). Eligible participants included gynecologists with exposure to robotic surgery who were either (1) still in specialty training or (2] within three years of completing their postgraduate training or fellowship. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic information, details on surgical experience, access to robotic platforms, and self-perceived confidence in different surgical approaches. MAIN
resultsA total of 81 respondents completed the survey. Among the 63 surgeons with access to robotic surgery at their institutions, 29 reported high self-perceived confidence and 36 reported lower confidence. Factors associated with higher confidence included age > 35 years (51.8% vs. 33.3%; p < 0.001) and having received structured robotic training through a fellowship or industry-sponsored course (40.7% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.017). Departments performing ≥ 55 robotic procedures per year showed a greater likelihood of hosting surgeons with high confidence. Finally, age > 35 years and access to at least one dedicated robotic operating day per week weres independently associated with higher confidence.
conclusionSelf-perceived confidence in robotic surgery among early-career gynecologic surgeons appears to be associated with age, and regular access to robotic operating time. Summation: Being older than 35 years and performing robotic surgery at least once weekly are associated with greater confidence in the robotic approach, emphasizing the importance of experience and exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.