ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Transplant House Calls Plus Peer Mentorship: Assessing Impact on Living Donor Kidney Transplant Access and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Black Patients.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) offers the most favorable outcomes for patients with end-stage kidney disease, yet Black patients have disproportionately low LDKT rates. This multicenter randomized controlled trial tested whether Transplant House Calls (THC), a home-based education program that engages patients and social networks, with or without Peer Mentorship (PM), could increase LDKT access among Black patients. Between 2018 and 2020, 319 patients were randomized to Usual Care (UC), THC, or THC+PM. The primary outcome was LDKT within 1 year; secondary outcomes included living donor inquiries, donor evaluations, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to knowledge, attitudes, and readiness. Overall, 5% of patients received LDKT, with no statistically significant differences among groups (UC: 0%; THC: 5%; THC+PM: 6%, P=0.07). However, both THC and THC+PM participants were significantly more likely than UC patients to have at least one living donor inquiry (P=0.04 and P=0.01, respectively) and evaluation (P=0.04 and P=0.01, respectively). Intervention participants also showed greater improvements in LDKT knowledge, reduced concerns, increased readiness to act, and higher self-efficacy compared with UC. Although PM uptake was incomplete, satisfaction was high, and exploratory analyses suggested a potential incremental benefit. The COVID-19 pandemic curtailed intervention delivery, delayed donor evaluations and surgeries, and likely contributed to the modest transplant rates observed. In conclusion, culturally tailored, home-based education that directly engages patients' social networks improves intermediate outcomes and patient preparedness for LDKT. Further evaluation with larger samples, longer follow-up, and full THC and PM implementation is warranted to assess potential impact on reducing racial disparities in LDKT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41667857What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.