ReviewCommunications chemistry2026
Recent advances in coacervate protocells from passive catalysts to chemically programmable systems.
Review in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coacervates as bio-inspired intermediates for materials processing.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review highlights a clear change in focus in the study of coacervate droplets as protocell models, moving from their role as passive microreactors that concentrate reactants to their function as chemically programmable matter capable of information processing and lifelike behaviors. We use "Input → Written State → Output" as a guiding workflow, and discuss recent advances through three operational pillars. The first is local reactivity control, where the droplet microenvironment directs reaction pathways and spatial enzyme organization, including feedback loops where reactions regulate the physical state. The second pillar is the writing of internal states, which treats droplets as stimuli-addressable chemical memory with targets of selectivity, latency, and erasability. The third pillar involves external readouts, which transduce internal states into programmed cargo release and chemical signaling within environments and across protocell communities. Finally, we outline future perspectives, discussing the transition from programming deterministic functions to directing the evolution of protocell populations that exhibit collective behaviors. By offering a cohesive conceptual toolkit, this review provides new insights beyond the simple notion of "faster reactions in droplets" and toward the engineering of higher-order, cooperative architectures with lifelike functions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.