Observational studyInternational journal of obesity (2005)2026
The neural pathways of change: an fMRI study of the effects of behavioral change suggestions on value-based dietary decision-making.
Observational study in International journal of obesity (2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05101863 (How a Patient's Words Change the Rewarding Value of Food), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
How a Patient's Words Change the Rewarding Value of Food: Mapping the Neurocognitive Shift Generated by Motivational Interviewing During the Therapy of Food Addiction Onto the Brain - MOTIVFOOD
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResolving the ambivalence between immediate cravings and long-term consequences is a key target of communication-based interventions toward behavioral change, such as motivational interviewing. Here, we aimed at understanding how this ambivalence between changing and sustaining unhealthy eating habits influences food valuation and its neural mechanism.
methodsEighty-five participants with varying body mass indices and food addiction-like symptoms underwent a motivational interviewing session during which they formulated personal reasons for (i.e., change talk) and against (i.e., sustain talk) changing their current eating habits. One week later, they listened to their statements when rating how much they wanted to eat various food items for real at the end of the experiment while their brain activation was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging.
resultsFood choices were healthier when participants had listened to their change talk statements, and more based on taste following sustain talk statements. This effect was stronger in participants with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
conclusionThese findings indicate that shifting between changing and sustaining unhealthy eating habits biases food valuation and its encoding in neural pathways linked to valuation, cognitive control, and craving as a function of weight status. STUDY-PRE-REGISTRATION: This study was pre-registered (https:/clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05101863).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.