SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2026
Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments in borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are over-represented in psychiatric services, and their suicide mortality is markedly higher than that of the general population. This network meta-analysis evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for symptoms of BPD. A systematic search of Medline®, Web of Science®, and Google Scholar® identified randomised clinical trials comparing active drugs with placebo or another agent between 15 January and 12 February 2024. Standardised mean differences were estimated using random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses. The level of evidence (LoE) for significant drug-placebo comparisons was rated using GRADE NMA guidance. Thirty-five trials including 2551 participants assessed 26 treatments against placebo: 18 had low, five moderate, and 12 high risk of bias. Topiramate (200-250 mg/day, 8-10 weeks), lamotrigine (50-200 mg/day, 8 weeks), and aripiprazole (15 mg/day, 8 weeks) most effectively reduced hostility, aggressiveness, and anger, and improved anger control. Carbamazepine (200-1200 mg/ day, 6 weeks) and asenapine (5-10 mg/day, 12 weeks) improved impulsivity and emotional dysregulation, respectively. Topiramate, lamotrigine, and aripiprazole demonstrated high, moderate, and moderate LoE for hostility and anger reduction. Carbamazepine and asenapine demonstrated low and very low LoE for impulsivity and emotional dysregulation. Conversely, alprazolam, methylphenidate, haloperidol, and valproate had only low-certainty evidence in unselected BPD samples and should not be prioritised. Prescription should be limited to specific, individualised indications, such as panic, comorbid ADHD, or transient psychotic features, following cautious clinical appraisal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41667836What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.