Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667831›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Respiratory physiology after resupination following prone ventilation to predict 28-day mortality in mechanically ventilated patients: a machine learning analysis.

Lada Lijović, Tariq A Dam, Moon Seong Baek, Tae Wan Kim, Gyungah Kim, Paul W G Elbers, Won-Young Kim, Dutch ICU Data Sharing Collaborators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lada LijovićDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam PublicHealth, Amsterdam CardiovascularScience, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tariq A DamDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam PublicHealth, Amsterdam CardiovascularScience, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Moon Seong BaekDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Wan KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gyungah KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Paul W G ElbersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science, Amsterdam PublicHealth, Amsterdam CardiovascularScience, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Won-Young KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. wykim81@cau.ac.kr.
Dutch ICU Data Sharing Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical significance of resupination parameters following prone positioning remains largely unknown. This study employed machine learning to predict the survival of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) by analyzing oxygenation and respiratory mechanics after resupination. Data were extracted from the COVID-Predict Dutch Data Warehouse. Patients receiving MV who underwent the supine–prone–supine sequence were selected, and the variables related to respiratory physiology within 4 h before proning and after resupination were recorded. Machine learning models were trained on the features selected using LASSO regression to predict the 28-day mortality. Patients who did not survive (157/522, 30.1%) had lower PaO2/FiO2 values, higher ventilatory ratios, increased physiological dead space, higher driving pressure, and lower static and dynamic lung compliance values at resupination. The predictive performance of the individual clinical parameters for 28-day mortality was generally modest, and FiO2, PaO2/FiO2, physiological dead space, and dynamic lung compliance were the best predictors of mortality. Overall, XGBoost showed the best recall (0.732) and maintained the highest AUC (0.719), while its F1-score (0.500) was the best for predicting mortality despite a low precision (0.380). Survival after prone positioning in patients receiving MV can be stratified by physiological responses after resupination.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Physiological PhenomenaAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsProne PositionRespiratory Mechanics

Identifiers

PMID41667831
PMCPMC12963402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.