ArticleScientific reports2026
Removal of Sr (II) from aqueous solutions by adsorption using amberlite XAD-7 resin impregnated with TOPO extractant.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Green Chemistry and Analytical Spectroscopy for Brilliant Blue G Removal Using Amberlite XAD7HP Resin.Polymers · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research investigation deals with efficiently removing strontium ions from aqueous solutions, a problem with significant environmental and health implications due to radioactive contamination. The performance and potential of Amberlite XAD-7 resin impregnated with TOPO extractant was evaluated to remove strontium ions from aqueous solutions. The influence of main operating conditions such as the initial pH, initial concentration of strontium in the solution, contact time, impregnation ratio, and adsorbent dosage, was evaluated. The adsorbents were characterized using SEM and FTIR analyses both before and after impregnation, as well as after the adsorption process. The study of the effect of contact time on the adsorption process was carried out in order to achieve the adsorption equilibrium time and determine the appropriate kinetic model. The experimental results showed that the adsorption process reaches equilibrium within 240 min, and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model is very suitable to describe this adsorption process (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.