Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667775›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Integrating deep learning with physics based modeling enables high precision antibody antigen interface prediction.

Kanchanok Kodchakorn, Piyachat Udomwong, Thanathat Pamonsupornwichit, Thanyaluck Phitak, Chatchai Tayapiwatana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kanchanok KodchakornOffice of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. kanchanok.k@outlook.com.
Piyachat UdomwongInternational College of Digital Innovation, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Thanathat PamonsupornwichitCenter of Biomolecular Therapy and Diagnostic, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Thanyaluck PhitakDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Chatchai TayapiwatanaCenter of Biomolecular Therapy and Diagnostic, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. chatchai.t@cmu.ac.th.

Funding

Chiang Mai University 2569A10412029, TGCMU2567P007, and R68IN00231CMU Proactive Researcher, Chiang Mai University 768/2567National Research Council of Thailand N34E670096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate antibody-antigen (Ab-Ag) docking is hindered by CDR flexibility, discontinuous epitopes, and the absence of reliable binding-site restraints. This study presents a deep learning-augmented docking framework that integrates ParaDeep, a sequence-based paratope predictor, with the PyDockWEB scoring engine to provides a practical and interpretable framework for guiding docking using sequence-derived paratopes. ParaDeep predicts binding residues directly from concatenated VH/VL sequences, and these residues are used as spatial restraints within the PyDockWEB pipeline. Across 50 Ab-Ag complexes from AACDB, DL-guided targeted docking improved performance for the majority of cases relative to blind docking. Interface RMSD decreased overall (median 10.171 Å to 1.193 Å, p = 0.0016), and TM-score proximity showed a significant shift toward native folds (p = 0.0256). DockQ distributions exhibited a clear rightward shift, with median scores increasing from 0.0523 to 0.6799 and 46% of targeted models reaching high-quality classification. Structural analysis indicated that high-DockQ interfaces were more hydrophilic (–1.33 ± 0.52 vs. − 0.56 ± 0.88, p = 0.037) and enriched in coil regions, suggesting that moderate flexibility and polar complementarity may be associated with near-native docking convergence. Cross-metric analysis evaluated strong agreement between TM-score and DockQ (ρ = 0.854 for targeted vs. 0.782 for blind), indicating concurrent improvements in interface and global accuracy. Importantly, paratope-size correlation analyses showed no association with docking accuracy, whereas re-analysis of initially misclassified models using AppA-derived paratopes recovered most models, suggesting that the spatial precision of predicted restraint placement is a major contributor to docking outcomes in this rigid-body setting, while restraint count alone is not informative. In summary, ParaDeep-guided docking provides a practical and interpretable framework for integrating DL-derived paratope information into a physics-based docking framework. Rather than introducing a new docking paradigm, this work suggests that DL-derived residue-level priors can improve the efficiency and accuracy of rigid-body Ab-Ag docking on average, while retaining physical transparency and mechanistic interpretability. The framework offers a scalable and biologically informed complement to blind docking, with potential for integration into iterative antibody design and structure-guided immune-engineering workflows.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntigen-Antibody ComplexAntigensDeep LearningMolecular Docking SimulationBinding Sites, AntibodyHumansImmunoinformaticsProtein BindingProtein ConformationAntibodiesAntigen-Antibody ComplexAntigensDeep learningDockQMolecular dockingParaDeepParatope-guided validationPyDockWEBSequence-based paratope predictor

Identifiers

PMID41667775
PMCPMC12960944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.