SynthesisInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Is there sufficient evidence that the hyoid bone can be used for sexual dimorphism? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSex estimation using the hyoid bone is a complementary approach in forensic anthropology, valuable when other skeletal elements are unavailable. Its morphology shows sexual dimorphism and age-related ossification and may assist neck-trauma assessment. However, population variability and methodological heterogeneity limit generalization. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the accuracy and forensic applicability of hyoid-based sex estimation.
methodFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to August 31, 2024. Human studies estimating sex from hyoid morphology were included, using macroscopic or imaging analyses with individuals of known sex as reference. Non-human studies, pathologies, and reviews were excluded. Reporting completeness and risk of bias were appraised with STROBE and QUADAS-2. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis using random-effects models provided pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates.
resultsOf 965 records, 23 studies were included, comprising 4,770 participants. Evidence supported sexual dimorphism of the hyoid, and fusion increased with age. Studies showed moderate-to-high reporting completeness but frequent bias concerns, particularly due to unclear patient-selection and reference-standard domains. The highest accuracies ranged from 69.2% to 93% using discriminant analysis and reached 95.4% with machine-learning approaches. A meta-analysis of six studies (827 participants) yielded pooled sensitivity 0.742 (95% CI 0.514–0.887) and specificity 0.799 (95% CI 0.612–0.909).
conclusionThe hyoid bone can be useful for sex estimation, especially in limited skeletal preservation. Multivariate and artificial intelligence models show promising performance, but evidence remains limited by heterogeneity. Future studies should standardize procedures and broaden validation across populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.