Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667755›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Reconsidering the language of healthcare: Toward terms that reflect empowerment and community connection.

Sarah Kostiuk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarah KostiukSaskatchewan Polytechnic, Regina Campus, Saskatoon, Canada. Sarah.Kostiuk@saskpolytech.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1746-9990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the concept of social prescribing gains momentum globally, including in Canada, questions have emerged about whether the term accurately reflects the model's intent. While the approach centers on connecting individuals to community-based resources to support health and well-being, the term prescribing may unintentionally evoke a medicalized or directive process. This article explores how language influences perception and engagement, particularly among diverse populations with varying relationships to healthcare systems. This piece advocates for reconsidering the leveraging of terminology within the social prescribing model to enhance clarity and inclusivity across diverse communities. By aligning language more closely with the model's foundational principles of empowerment, facilitation, and community connection, practitioners can better communicate its intent and value. Terms such as community connection referral or community connector may offer more accessible and culturally attuned alternatives, potentially improving public understanding, uptake, and implementation.

Indexed as

Community connectionCommunity healthHealthcare languageHealth communicationPatient-centered careSocial prescribing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.