Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667726›Full record

ArticleCommunications engineering2026

High-resolution, multidimensional solar radiation evaluation for the scientific protection of built heritage sites.

Pingan Ni, Duo Zhang, Wenbei Bi, Fuming Lei, Chenxue Yang, Jiaqing Yan, Yingjun Yue, Yidan Feng, Zhuoxin Zheng, Jingpeng Fu and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Pingan Ni *School of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8290-4203
Duo Zhang *School of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Wenbei Bi *School of Architecture, Chang'an University, Xi'an, China.
Fuming Lei *School of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Chenxue YangSchool of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Jiaqing YanSchool of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Yingjun YueSchool of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Yidan FengSchool of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Zhuoxin ZhengSchool of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Jingpeng FuSchool of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Jiangli WangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Chaolong MaLongmen Research Institute, Luoyang, China.
Fan LiLongmen Research Institute, Luoyang, China.
Shanshan YaoSchool of Architecture, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hanjie ZhengDepartment of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xihua University, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-5250
Hongli SunSchool of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Guojin QinSchool of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China.
Bao-Jie HeSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8841-0711
Zengfeng YanSchool of Architecture, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China. yanzengfeng@xauat.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7323-4922
Borong LinKey Laboratory of Eco Planning & Green Building, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China. linbr@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3848-2837

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) No.52278127National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) No.52425801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solar radiation heterogeneity across exposed heritage sites drives material deterioration, yet systematic quantification remains elusive due to the absence of operational assessment frameworks. Here, we present a multidisciplinary framework that integrates high-resolution geometric data with multidimensional sky models to quantify solar radiation distribution of large-scale heritage surfaces. Applied to grotto temple sites, we demonstrate that annual cumulative direct solar radiation exhibits substantially greater spatial variability across surface orientations than diffuse radiation. Monthly direct radiation shows marked inter-heritage variations with less predictable patterns compared to diffuse components. Radiation intensity differences between winter and summer solstices are pronounced, with noon-time exposure varying up to threefold across orientations. Critically, solar radiation-driven thermal stress calculations reveal extreme gradients, with protruding surfaces and edges experiencing pressures of 400-500 kPa, while adjacent shaded areas sustain only 50-100 kPa, creating more than fivefold stress differentials. This flexible framework provides site-specific performance metrics to inform the development of advanced conservation materials and targeted intervention strategies for diverse heritage sites.

Identifiers

PMID41667726
PMCPMC13003093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.