ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Reported adverse events of the anchor prong clip: a MAUDE database analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adverse events and device failures of the transoral incisionless fundoplication system: a MAUDE database analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe anchor-pronged clip has been widely adopted for closure of large defects, offering enhanced tensile strength and grasping ability. However, reported real-world device and patient adverse events are limited in literature. Our focus is to identify the most commonly reported adverse events, device issues, and their clinical implications.
methodsThe Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was analyzed from February 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024 to report post-marketing surveillance data on these anchor pronged clips.
resultsApproximately 135 reported cases with 187 device issues and 30 patient adverse events were examined. The most reported device problems were due to activation, position, or separation (53.5%). Common indications included defect closures after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (29.9%) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) (23.9%). From the total reports analyzed, patient adverse events were noted in 21.1% (n = 30) of cases which comprised of hemorrhage (43.3%; n = 13), perforation (10.0%; n = 3), abdominal pain (6.7%; n = 2) among others.
conclusionsOur analysis of the MAUDE database suggests that the MANTIS
Indexed as
Identifiers
41667695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.