ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Dynamics of long-term adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in patients after myocardial infarction.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recommendations to use oral lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, numerous studies have shown substantial under-utilization. We assessed long-term persistence and dynamics of adherence to oral LLTs in patients after their first ever myocardial infarction (MI) in Sweden. A total of 83,407 patients with a MI (2010–2017) and who were dispensed an oral LLT were identified through Swedish nationwide health registries. After one, three and eight years of follow-up, persistence to lipid-lowering therapies was 90.3%, 71.1% and 50.8%, respectively. Adherence, quantified using the proportion of days covered (PDC), was a highly dynamic phenomenon with patients frequently moving between categories (high, medium, and low) of adherence. Adherence was high among persistent patients (> 70% had PDC ≥ 80%), but only 30% regained high adherence following non-persistence. Higher age, prescription from primary care, and higher income were associated with lower risk of non-persistence whereas higher comorbidity index, no prior statin use and concomitant use of platelet inhibitors were associated with increased risk. This study highlights the dynamic nature of adherence at the patient-level and that particular focus on adherence may be needed following non-persistence. Socioeconomic and clinical factors associated with non-persistence were identified, which in turn may help target measures to improve adherence in this high-risk patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41667683What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.