ArticleScientific reports2026
Modelling the effect of motivation on mental health components with fuzzy logic among elite athletes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oral health literacy and its related factors among community-dwelling older adults: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elite athletes operate in high-stress, feedback-rich environments where mental health risk is shaped by motivation and training climate. This study models the joint effects of intrinsic motivation, psychological safety, and mental well-being on anxiety, depression, athlete-specific strain, and burnout using an interpretable fuzzy-logic framework alongside conventional regression. A sample of 247 athletes completed validated measures (SMS-6 Intrinsic Motivation, Psychological Safety, SWEMWBS, GAD-7, PHQ-9, APSQ, and BMS). After pre-processing and standard analyses, we constructed a Mamdani-type Fuzzy Inference System. To accurately represent the non-linear transitions between psychological states, the model specifies trapezoidal membership functions for boundary linguistic variables and triangular membership functions for intermediate categories. The system utilises a transparent rule base (primary risk from low IM; protection from PS/MWB; synergistic protection when both are high), min-max aggregation, and centroid defuzzification. Rule weights and breakpoints were calibrated against observed score distributions to minimise mean absolute error (MAE). Multiple regressions indicated that PS and MWB independently predicted lower risk across all outcomes; however, IM emerged as a significant positive predictor of depression and anxiety (p < 0.05). Further diagnostics confirmed this as a suppression effect, with all VIF values < 1.5. Visual and quantitative analyses confirmed three regularities: (i) a primary risk gradient when IM, PS, and MWB are low; (ii) buffering as PS or MWB increase; and (iii) a low-risk "basin" when PS and MWB are jointly high. Comparative metrics (MAE/RMSE) showed that the FIS model offers superior predictive accuracy and interpretability compared to standard linear approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.