Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667676›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Class-attention pooling and token sparsity based vision transformers for chest X-ray interpretation.

Vaibhav Lokunde, Keerthan Sundar, Anuj Khokhar, Bhawana Tyagi, Naga Priyadarsini R, MohanKumar B

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vaibhav LokundeSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Keerthan SundarSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anuj KhokharSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bhawana TyagiSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. bhawana.tyagi@vit.ac.in.
Naga Priyadarsini RSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
MohanKumar BSchool of Computer Science & Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest radiography is the most widely used imaging technique for the diagnosing of lung diseases, but interpreting X-rays can be very difficult due to the subtle abnormalities and variations in image quality taken during X-rays. While deep learning models, especially the Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs), have shown strong performance when it comes to detecting pneumonia and other conditions, Vision Transformers (ViTs) have recently surpassed CNNs on several chest X-ray benchmarks by dividing images into small patches and learning global relationships. However, standard ViTs can sometimes focus on irrelevant regions, making their decisions less interpretable. To address this, we propose an enhanced ViT model tailored for chest X-ray analysis that prioritizes both accuracy and explainability. Our model introduces class-attention pooling technique, where each disease-specific class token learns to highlight relevant regions of the image, improving disease-wise focus. Token sparsity and random token dropping further help the model attend to only the most informative patches, enhancing robustness against noise. A convolutional stem is added before patch creation to extract fine local features like edges and textures, ensuring early capture of lung-specific patterns. Additionally, each X-ray undergoes preprocessing using Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), which enhances local contrast and makes subtle lesions more visible. The model is trained with mixed-precision computation, a warm-up cosine learning rate schedule, and the AdamW optimizer, allowing stable and efficient training on large datasets. It is then evaluated on Tuberculosis Chest X-Rays and Pulmonary Chest X-Rays datasets which are publicly available, the proposed framework achieved 99.19% Training accuracy, a Validation Accuracy of 97.78%, an F1-score of 0.94, and an AUC of 0.99, outperforming the baseline ViT. It is pointed out that the above scores are obtained based on the image-level split, owing to the limitations of the dataset, and the performance may be over-estimated compared to the validation on the patient level. The Grad-CAM heatmaps further confirm the fact that the model focuses on clinically relevant areas such as opacities or nodules, reinforcing interpretability and trust. Overall, this improved ViT framework offers both high diagnostic accuracy and also clear visual explanations, implying its possible usage in acting as an AI assistant for radiologists in efficiently detecting lung diseases.

Indexed as

Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, ThoracicConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansLungChest x-ray classificationClass-attention poolingExplainable AIGrad-CAMRobust trainingToken-level sparsityVision transformer

Identifiers

PMID41667676
PMCPMC12957388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.