Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667640›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Pruning tree forest and re-sampling for class imbalanced problem.

Nosheen Faiz, Soofia Iftikhar, Salman Jan, Muhammad Hamraz, Muhammad Aamir, Dost Muhammad Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nosheen FaizDepartment of Statistics, Abdul Wali Khan university, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Soofia IftikharDepartment of Statistics, Shaheed Benazir Woman University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Salman JanFaculty of Computer Studies, Arab Open University-Bahrain, A'Ali, 18211, Bahrain. salman.jan@aou.org.bh.
Muhammad HamrazDepartment of Statistics, Abdul Wali Khan university, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Muhammad AamirDepartment of Statistics, Abdul Wali Khan university, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Dost Muhammad KhanDepartment of Statistics, Abdul Wali Khan university, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Class imbalance remains a critical challenge in machine learning, as it often leads to biased predictions where algorithms disproportionately favor the majority class, resulting in the misclassification of minority class instances and reduced overall model performance. This study explores an innovative approach to addressing class imbalance in Random Forests by combining pruning with resampling techniques. While pruning typically improves performance and reduces computational costs, its effectiveness can be limited in complex ensembles dealing with imbalanced data. To tackle this, the proposed method incorporates three resampling strategies: under-sampling the majority class, over-sampling the minority class, and a hybrid of both. After balancing the training data, multiple trees are grown from bootstrap samples, and only those with low out-of-bag error rates are selected for the final ensemble. The classification performance of the proposed method is evaluated and compared against standard algorithms including k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Tree, Random Forest (RF), Balanced Random Forest (BRF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The results demonstrate that the proposed method outperformed its competitors in most of the cases.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsHumansPrediction AlgorithmsRandom ForestSupport Vector MachineBootstrapClassificationClass imbalanceOver-samplingPruningRandom forestTreesUnder-sampling

Identifiers

PMID41667640
PMCPMC12960936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.