ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhanced diabetes prediction using pre-trained CNNs, LSTM, and conditional GAN on transformed numerical data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision tree with randomized grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and optimal feature scaling for diabetes diagnosis.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes remains a major public health challenge, contributing to complications such as kidney disease, cardiovascular disorders, and diabetic retinopathy. Early detection is essential for timely intervention, yet prediction from structured biomedical data is often hindered by limited sample size and feature diversity. This study investigates a deep learning framework that combines tabular-to-image transformation, pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks, and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to enhance diabetes prediction. Using the Pima Indians Diabetes Dataset, numerical features were transformed into 2D image representations based on correlation patterns and feature importance scores. Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks generated additional synthetic samples for training. Feature extraction was performed with DenseNet201, ResNet152, Xception, and EfficientNetB4, followed by classification using LSTM networks optimised via Bayesian search. In five-fold cross-validation, the deep learning pipeline achieved 94% accuracy and 98% AUC on the augmented PIMA dataset, showing improved performance compared to commonly reported benchmarks; however, these results may partially reflect the influence of synthetic data. When evaluated on the Frankfurt Diabetes Dataset, the model exhibited comparable performance, although the limited number of samples indicates that additional studies are required to firmly establish its generalizability. The proposed framework demonstrates promising performance for diabetes prediction from structured data. While the results suggest potential applicability to broader biomedical classification tasks, further validation on large, demographically diverse, and multi-institutional datasets is essential before considering any clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.