Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667615›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Comparative performance analysis of quantum feature maps for quantum kernel-based machine learning.

Ravi Kumar Jha, Nikola Kasabov, Saugat Bhattacharyya, Damien Coyle, Girijesh Prasad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ravi Kumar JhaIntelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, BT48 7JL, UK. jha-r@ulster.ac.uk.
Nikola KasabovIntelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, BT48 7JL, UK.
Saugat BhattacharyyaIntelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, BT48 7JL, UK.
Damien CoyleIntelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, BT48 7JL, UK.
Girijesh PrasadIntelligent Systems Research Centre, Ulster University, Londonderry, BT48 7JL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantum algorithms have become a popular research domain in recent times for discovering quantum-enhanced solutions in machine learning applications. Quantum kernels are one of the directions that establish such quantum-enhanced solutions to some extent. This work presents a detailed analysis of the quantum kernel approach leveraging feature maps and relevant hyperparameters to develop enhanced quantum kernels. The study includes a new high-order feature map and assesses five existing state-of-the-art feature maps for enhanced quantum kernel classifiers. Additionally, the significance of the rotational factor as a hyperparameter is highlighted for improving kernel performance. Also, it is analyzed whether different hyperparameter-tuned feature maps can lead to enhanced decision boundaries, demonstrating kernel expressivity. The analysis is undertaken on classification tasks using four different nonlinear datasets of distinct complexity. Comparative evaluations are also made with traditional machine learning models-Support Vector Machines (Linear and RBF), Naïve Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting, and MLP. Overall, the study demonstrates that a well-tuned quantum feature map can enhance the generalization ability of quantum kernels, making them more effective for broader quantum-enhanced machine learning applications.

Indexed as

ClassificationEncoding functionFeature mapMachine learningQuantum kernel

Identifiers

PMID41667615
PMCPMC12960865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.