ArticleScientific reports2026
Positive ascites cytology in interval debulking surgery predicts poor outcomes of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer achieving complete tumor resection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positive ascites cytology is a known poor prognostic factor in ovarian cancer, but its impact after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with complete tumor resection remains unclear. Among 4944 patients, 191 underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) and 59 underwent NAC followed by interval debulking surgery (NAC-IDS), all achieving R0 resection at stage III. Kaplan-Meier, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed. Positive ascites cytology was independently associated with higher recurrence and mortality at 5 years [odds ratio (OR) of recurrence at 5 years = 2.412, P = 0.003; OR of mortality at 5 years = 2.025, P = 0.010]. Subgroup analysis showed greater risk in NAC-IDS than in PDS [NAC-IDS: HR of PFS = 2.003, P = 0.029; HR of OS = 3.259, P = 0.006; PDS: HR of PFS = 1.549, P = 0.031; HR of OS = 1.789, P = 0.018]. The interaction effect analysis suggested that positive ascites cytology was associated with a higher risk of mortality at 5 years in NAC patients than in PDS patients [OR of NAC-IDS = 3.722, OR of PDS = 1.151, OR for interaction = 3.234]. The present results indicate that positive ascites cytology in NAC-IDS predicts poor survival outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.