Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667596›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Privacy-aware speaker trait and multimodal features relationship analysis in job interviews.

Candy Olivia Mawalim, Chee Wee Leong, Shogo Okada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Candy Olivia MawalimGraduate School of Advanced Science and Technology, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 923-1292, Nomi, Japan. candylim@jaist.ac.jp.
Chee Wee LeongEducational Testing Service, AI Product and Engineering, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
Shogo OkadaGraduate School of Advanced Science and Technology, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 923-1292, Nomi, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K21245JST CRONOS JPMJCS24K7JST Moonshot R&D program JPMJMS2031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the use of speech data for applications like emotion detection and health profiling grows, so do the privacy risks associated with voice recordings that can reveal sensitive speaker traits. This study investigates voice anonymization methods designed to protect speaker identity while maintaining essential speech characteristics for accurate trait inference, specifically within the context of job interviews. Our experiments show that while anonymization alters several acoustic parameters, the anonymized speech from signal processing-based methods remains suitable for overall trait assessment, with performance comparable to original speech. The phase vocoder-based method, in particular, offers modest privacy gains with an acceptable trade-off in utility, especially in scenarios with minimal attack vectors. In contrast, a neural audio codec-based method altered prosodic features critical for speaker trait estimation, slightly reducing performance in this specific task. Despite this, when carefully configured, this method provides greater privacy and generally preserves utility for speech recognition and quality assessment, even under semi-informed attack scenarios.

Indexed as

PrivacySpeechVoiceHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedHuman-computer interactionPrivacy protectionSpeaker traitsVoice anonymization

Identifiers

PMID41667596
PMCPMC12963448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.