ArticleScientific reports2026
An automated framework for qur'anic education of the hearing-impaired using body pose classification and Arabic sign language integration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, an accessible pipeline of automated teaching of the Quran to deaf and hard-of-hearing students is proposed based on the identification of Arabic Sign Language (ArSL) postures that match the words of S The piping includes an instructional method that is accessible to both deaf and hard-of-hearing students, necessitating the use of Arabic Sign Language postures to correspond to the words. A designed list of 2,054 labeled images was obtained with local institutions working with deaf users as guidance. In order to be linguistic and unambiguously semantically designated with Qur’anic terms, DIN 31,635 transliterations is used as a canonical internal representation of all class annotations, and Arabic forms are used to present them. Two complementary approaches are evaluated: (i) a pose-keypoint classification approach using MediaPipe features, trained with multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) classifiers; and (ii) an image-based model utilizing a ResNet50 backbone. Performance evaluation is conducted using an internal train/validation/test split and assessed based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrices, and ROC-AUC metrics. Within this evaluation framework, the ResNet50-based model achieves near-perfect performance, while the keypoint-based models also demonstrate high performance. Such results are limited to the dataset and the evaluation protocol that were adopted and cannot be generalized as performance guarantees. To this end, we explicitly note the following constraints: a single sutra, a small dataset size, the use of fixed frames instead of continuous signing (and co-articulation not modeled), the possibility of bias of the signers and regional variants, and low input of the lower-body landmarks due to framing. Future directions will include more generalization by signer-independent evaluation, extension to a wider range of sūrahs and ArSL variants, continuous sign-language recognition, and on-device real-time implementation of an inclusive Qur’anic education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.