ArticleScientific reports2026
Error characterization and error correction approaches in combinatorial DNA-based storage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data storage in DNA has recently emerged as a promising archival solution, offering space-efficient and long-lasting digital storage. DNA’s ultra-high density and durability make it an attractive medium for long-term data storage. Among the various approaches, combinatorial DNA encoding further enhances this potential by increasing the logical density through the use of combinations of DNA shortmers, where each sequence position is represented by a set of predefined short DNA fragments. This approach allows for the encoding of a larger data volume using fewer synthesis cycles. However, this method introduces unique challenges, particularly in terms of synthesis and sequencing errors. In this study, we focus on the characterization of errors in combinatorial DNA-based storage systems. Our analysis revealed that asymmetric combinatorial erasure errors, defined as the omission of a single shortmer from the set defining the combinatorial letter, are a prevalent error type in combinatorial DNA-based storage, particularly in large-scale systems where read coverage is limited. We analyzed two previously published datasets, observing a high frequency of erasure errors, where missing sequences obstruct the reconstruction of specific combinatorial letters. To better understand these observations, we conducted a large-scale experimental proof-of-concept of a combinatorial DNA-based storage system and evaluated the error characteristics of the system. Our analysis confirmed that erasure errors become increasingly prominent with reduced sequencing depth. We demonstrated that below 50 reads per sequence, the frequency of erasure errors sharply increased. We developed an asymmetric error-correcting code specifically designed to address these errors. The code utilizes tensor-product (TP) codes to integrate standard erasure and substitution-correcting codes (such as Reed-Solomon (RS) codes) with Varshamov-Tenengolts (VT) codes, which are asymmetric error-correcting codes. We validated the performance of our new error correction code both in simulations and in a second large-scale experiment. The experimental comparison was designed to directly compare our suggested code with the more straightforward 2D Reed-Solomon (2D RS) scheme. Our method consistently outperformed the 2D RS scheme, particularly in scenarios dominated by erasure errors. Notably, in the second large-scale experiment, our method demonstrated superior decoding accuracy even under low coverage conditions, where the traditional 2D RS approach struggled to decode the data. Our findings demonstrate the importance of tailored error correction schemes in DNA-based data storage. By directly addressing the asymmetric nature of errors in combinatorial DNA, our method provides improved decoding accuracy under a wide range of conditions. The integration of such tailored error correction methods with existing DNA-based data storage technologies has the potential to deliver more reliable and scalable DNA-based data applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.