Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667442›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Transfer learning in DeepLC improves LC retention time prediction across substantially different modifications and setups.

Robbin Bouwmeester, Alireza Nameni, Arthur Declercq, Robbe Devreese, Kevin Velghe, Vladimir Gorshkov, Pelayo A Penanes, Frank Kjeldsen, Magali Rompais, Christine Carapito and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Robbin Bouwmeester *VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-7029
Alireza Nameni *VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7471-9195
Arthur DeclercqVIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.
Robbe DevreeseVIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3432-1502
Kevin VelgheVIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9968-6043
Vladimir GorshkovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-5785
Pelayo A PenanesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4150-9965
Frank KjeldsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Magali RompaisBioOrganic Mass Spectrometry Laboratory (LSMBO), IPHC UMR 7178, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
Christine CarapitoBioOrganic Mass Spectrometry Laboratory (LSMBO), IPHC UMR 7178, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0079-319X
Ralf GabrielsVIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1679-1711
Lennart MartensVIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology, VIB, Ghent, Belgium. lennart.martens@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-4277-658X

Funding

Center for Bioanalytical SciencesDanish National Mass Spectrometry Platform for Functional ProteomicsEC | CHIST-ERA G0GDV23NEC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101080544EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101191739Lundbeck FoundationMarie Skłodowska-CurieUniversity of Southern Denmark SDU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While LC retention time prediction of peptides and their modifications has proven useful, widespread adoption and optimal performance are hindered by variations in experimental parameters. These variations can render retention time prediction models inaccurate and dramatically reduce the value of predictions for identification, validation, and DIA spectral library generation. To date, mitigation of these issues has been attempted through calibration or by training bespoke models for specific experimental setups, with only partial success. We here demonstrate that transfer learning can successfully overcome these limitations by leveraging pre-trained model parameters. Remarkably, this approach can even fit highly performant models to substantially different peptide modifications and LC conditions than those on which the model was originally trained. This impressive adaptability of transfer learning makes it a highly robust solution for accurate peptide retention time prediction across a very wide variety of imaginable proteomics workflows.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteomicsChromatography, LiquidPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsTransfer Machine LearningPeptides

Identifiers

PMID41667442
PMCPMC13002937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.