ArticleRNA biology2026
A transformer-based method for the cap analysis of gene expression and gene expression tag associated capping region prediction in RNA.
Article in RNA biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
5' RNA capping is one of the major post-transcriptional modifications for the mobility and stability of RNA molecules. Measuring 5' caps of RNAs can help quantify expression levels of mRNAs and lncRNAs. One of the most successful RNAseq methods that has used capping as a tool to quantify expression of transcription is Cap Analysis of Gene Expression (CAGE). Computational prediction of capping can therefore be used as a precursor to the prediction of transcriptional expression. Unfortunately, there is hardly any computational technique that has focused purely on predicting 5' capping. We have developed a transformer-based method for computational prediction of capping from DNA sequences. Our Llama and ReLoRA-based pre-training model, and Llama and LoRA-based fine-tuning model predict capping associated regions. We have used Leave-one-chromosome-out-cross-validation for our model. The average accuracy, and F1-score after fine-tuning the human genome hg19 (mouse genome mm9) for sequence classification is 79.12% (78.09%) and 78.11% (76.17%), respectively. We noted attention peak-based motifs having an aggregate Wilcoxon rank-sum p-value of 1.075e-10 between the attention peak region and the entire context window for the predicted positive motifs; an aggregate p-value of 7.17e-18 for the predicted negative motifs; and an aggregate p-value of 6.70e-08 between the attention peaks of the predicted positive and the predicted negative motifs. Our Llama-based approach aims to create a sequence-based framework to identify capping associated regions corresponding to CAGE peaks. Our analysis reveals statistically significant motifs from the regions of peak attention scores, which demonstrates biological relevance for some through their resident sites matching with known TF motifs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.