ArticleAnesthesia and pain medicine2026
Utility of the tympanic membrane temperature probe for continuous core temperature monitoring during general anesthesia: in vitro laboratory validation and prospective observational study.
Article in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContinuous tympanic membrane temperature (T-TM) monitoring is minimally invasive and may be suitable for core temperature measurement during anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of T-TM compared to infrared tympanic thermometer temperature (T-IRT) and esophageal temperature (T-ESO).
methodsThis study included both in vitro validation and a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary hospital. In vitro agreement between T-TM and T-ESO over a temperature range of 32 to 42°C was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Clinically, 40 adults undergoing general anesthesia were under continuous T-TM and T-ESO monitoring, with T-IRT measured at three perioperative time points. Agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, and temporal changes were assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Hypothermia was defined as core temperature < 36.0°C. Safety was assessed using otoscopy before and after anesthesia.
resultsIn vitro, T-TM and T-ESO showed minimal mean bias (-0.01°C; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.03 to 0.00°C), with limits of agreement (LoA) ranging from -0.22 to 0.20°C. Clinically, T-TM was comparable to T-IRT (mean bias: 0.04°C; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.07°C; LoA: -0.33 to 0.41°C) but consistently higher than T-ESO as anesthesia progressed (mean differences: 0.31 to 0.80°C; P < 0.001). Hypothermia detection was lower with T-TM (37.5%) than with T-ESO (85.0%) (P < 0.001). No otological complications were observed.
conclusionsT-TM demonstrated excellent agreement with T-ESO in vitro and was comparable to T-IRT in clinical settings. However, it tended to yield slightly higher readings than T-ESO, which should be considered during perioperative temperature monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.