Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667246›Full record

ReviewAnesthesia and pain medicine2026

Modern neuraxial labor analgesia: techniques, pharmacologic strategies, and maternal-fetal outcomes.

Ae-Ryoung Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ae-Ryoung LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuraxial labor analgesia (NLA) remains the gold standard for intrapartum pain management, providing superior analgesia, higher maternal satisfaction, and improved fetal safety compared with systemic or inhalational techniques. Recent advances in initiation methods- including epidural analgesia, combined spinal-epidural, and dural puncture epidural techniques-as well as optimized pharmacological regimens using low-concentration local anesthetics combined with lipophilic opioids, have improved analgesic onset, sacral coverage, and block uniformity while minimizing motor blockade. Modern maintenance strategies, particularly programmed intermittent epidural bolus administration with patient-controlled supplementation, further enhance analgesic quality and reduce local anesthetic consumption. NLA does not adversely affect obstetric outcomes, including labor duration, instrumental delivery, or cesarean section rates, and has no detrimental effect on Apgar scores, cord blood gas levels, or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. Ultrasound guidance reduces technical complications such as unintended dural puncture and failure. Long-term maternal and offspring outcomes, including postpartum depression and childhood neurodevelopmental disorders, have shown no causal association with NLA after rigorous adjustment for confounding factors. Collectively, modern neuraxial techniques provide effective, individualized, and physiologically favorable analgesia throughout labor with improvements in short- and long-term outcomes. Ongoing improvements in pharmacological approaches, adjuvant selection, and delivery algorithms will improve the safety, efficiency, and personalization of obstetric anesthesia practice.

Indexed as

Analgesia, epiduralLabor painMothers, Newborns, ObstetricsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41667246
PMCPMC12890544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.