Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667245›Full record

ReviewAnesthesia and pain medicine2026

From labor to surgery: expanding the role of programmed intermittent epidural bolus beyond obstetric.

Yu Jeong Bang, RyungA Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu Jeong BangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
RyungA KangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidural analgesia has been effective for postoperative pain control, but its use has declined owing to adverse effects, such as motor blockade and delayed recovery. However, in obstetric anesthesia, it remains the gold standard of care, especially with the development of programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB), which delivers boluses of local anesthetic at fixed intervals to improve drug spread and reduce motor blockade. Clinical studies on labor analgesia have demonstrated that PIEB offers superior analgesia, lower anesthetic consumption, and higher maternal satisfaction than continuous epidural infusion. These advantages align well with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocols, supporting early mobilization and opioid-sparing strategies. While most evidence comes from obstetric settings, emerging data suggest that PIEB also benefits perioperative patients and holds promise for broader surgical applicability. This review explores current knowledge and emerging evidence regarding the potential application of PIEB beyond labor analgesia.

Indexed as

Analgesia, epiduralAnalgesia, obstetricalInjections, epiduralLabor painPain, postoperativeProgrammed intermittent epidural bolus

Identifiers

PMID41667245
PMCPMC12890536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.