ArticleBMJ open2026
Differences in sexual risk behaviours, HIV care utilisation and experiences of stigma between transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men: findings from integrated biobehavioural surveys in Ukraine 2013-2018.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess whether transgender women who have sex with men (TGWSM) sampled in men who have sex with men (MSM) biobehavioural surveys in Ukraine experience different levels of sexual risk, stigma, HIV prevalence and engagement in the HIV care than cisgender MSM (CMSM).
designAnalysis of secondary data from three population-level cross-sectional surveys.
settingThe analysis was conducted on data from three rounds of integrated biobehavioural surveys of MSM in 27 cities of Ukraine from 2013 to 2018.
participantsData from n=18 621 MSM with n=18 102 CMSM and n=503 TGWSM. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were differences in sexual risk behaviours, HIV testing and treatment uptake, and the secondary outcomes were differences in lifetime experiences of stigma, coercive sex and physical assault (in the 2018 survey only) between CMSM and TGWSM.
resultsCompared with CMSM, TGWSM were more likely to be clients of non-governmental organisations (adjusted OR, aOR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.67), engage in commercial sex (last month; aOR: 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.61), have group sex (aOR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.61), more long-term sex partners (last month; adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.27), history of imprisonment (aOR: 1.51, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.31) and engage in chemsex (last month, aOR: 1.58, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.23). We found no difference in HIV prevalence (5.17% in TGWSM vs 5.43% in CMSM, p=0.065). In 2018, more TGWSM reported lifetime experience of stigma from family and friends (aOR: 3.58, 95% CI 2.54 to 5.04), general social stigma (aOR: 3.13, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.41), anticipated healthcare stigma (aOR: 3.63, 95% CI 2.53 to 5.16), physical assault (aOR: 2.73, 95% CI 1.85 to 4.03) and coercive sex (aOR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.99 to 4.55) than CMSM.
conclusionsTGWSM in Ukraine may be at increased risk of HIV acquisition compared to CMSM due to many factors including elevated levels of stigma and violence. Services specifically tailored for transgender people are needed to help reduce these high-risk behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.