Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667172›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Advancing Strategies to Optimise the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting (ASPIRE-PONV) study: rationale and design for a sequential, repeated crossover trial.

Ellen G Stallings, Jonathan P Wanderer, Mark Balavage, Christopher Patrick Henson, Leslie Fowler, Svetlana Eden, Matthew S Shotwell, Calvin Gruss, Kelsey R Neuhafen, Brian J Gelfand and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07152249 (Advancing Strategies to Optimize the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07152249 narecruitingnot on this map

Advancing Strategies to Optimize the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting (ASPIRE-PONV) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled19,480ConditionsPostoperative Nausea, Postoperative VomitingArmsAW-D Clinical Decision Support Tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ellen G StallingsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jonathan P WandererDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mark BalavageDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Christopher Patrick HensonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-026X
Leslie FowlerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Svetlana EdenDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Matthew S ShotwellDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Calvin GrussDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kelsey R NeuhafenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Brian J GelfandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Miklos D KertaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA Miklos.kertai@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6611-7998
ASPIRE-PONV Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis project, in adult surgical patients, will evaluate whether the creation of a customised checklist, driven by a clinical decision support tool, is able to improve anaesthesia providers' adherence to consensus guidelines and standardised practice recommendations for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intervention will be evaluated using a sequential, repeated crossover design at the institutional level, with designated washout, control and intervention periods. The surgical case will serve as the unit of analysis. The primary outcome is adherence to appropriate PONV prophylaxis administration guidelines. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of PONV and length of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and statistical analysis plan provide an outline of the study design, primary and secondary end points and analytic approach. The Advancing Strategies to Optimise the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting trial has received approval from the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB: 250773). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national conferences. Findings from this trial will inform best practices for timely antiemetic prophylaxis, with the goal of reducing PONV incidence and shortening PACU stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07152249.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsPerioperative CarePostoperative Nausea and VomitingAdultChecklistCross-Over StudiesGuideline AdherenceHumansLength of StayResearch DesignAntiemeticsadult anaesthesiaresearch designsurgery

Identifiers

PMID41667172
PMCPMC12911707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.