Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667168›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Is home-based self-swabbing feasible for postoperative wound culture after cardiac surgery? A multicentre mixed-methods feasibility study in the UK.

Melissa Rochon, Judith Tanner, Karen Cariaga, Roy Harris, Keith Wilson, Chris Newby, Kumbi Kariwo, Luciana Sowole, Sarah J Bolton, Janet Bouttell and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07200401 (A Feasibility Study to Explore the Safety, Acceptability and Potential Cost Effectiveness of Self-swabbing at Home to Obtain Usable Surgical Wound Culture Swabs), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07200401 nacompletednot on this map

A Feasibility Study to Explore the Safety, Acceptability and Potential Cost Effectiveness of Self-swabbing at Home to Obtain Usable Surgical Wound Culture Swabs

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2026 to 2026Enrolled43ConditionsCardiac Surgery, Infection, Soft Tissue, Wound Healing, SwabsArmsSelf-swabbing of surgical wound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Melissa RochonDirectorate of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK melissa.rochon1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-2256
Judith TannerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-3149
Karen CariagaDirectorate of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5525-2362
Roy HarrisResearch Support Services (Leicester Hub), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Keith WilsonResearch Department (ICECAP), Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1288-1293
Chris NewbyResearch Support Services (Leicester Hub), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kumbi KariwoEquality Inclusion and Diversity, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Aston, UK.
Luciana SowoleDirectorate of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-4570
Sarah J BoltonCHEATA, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-6903
Janet BouttellCHEATA, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-5483
Ishtiaq AhmedDepartment Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3467-0397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor access to surgical wound swabbing in the community often results in delayed or inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for surgical site infections. This delay can contribute to prolonged wound healing and poor antimicrobial stewardship. Patient self-swabbing at home could improve access to diagnostic testing, but its feasibility and acceptability remain unexplored. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: TREASURE is a multicentre, mixed-methods feasibility study. A total of 40 patient participants and 10 staff stakeholders will be included. 40 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy will be recruited from Harefield Hospital (n=25) and the Royal Sussex County Hospital (n=15). Eligible participants will receive a coproduced self-swabbing set of instructions and kit at discharge and perform wound swabbing at home within 1-21 days, observed remotely by a researcher via Microsoft Teams. Swabs will be couriered to a central laboratory for bacterial culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing for pathogens.The primary feasibility outcome is the proportion of patients successfully completing self-swabbing at home to obtain usable culture swabs with samples received at the laboratory within 24 hours and deemed suitable for processing. Secondary safety and acceptability outcomes include usability of the kit and instructions; patient satisfaction; viability of samples for laboratory analysis; and recruitment and retention rates. A 30-day follow-up will capture wound complications, antibiotic prescribing and healthcare utilisation via patient questionnaires, case note review, general practitioner confirmation and patient interviews. 10 staff stakeholders will be interviewed to inform pathway development.Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, with proportions reported alongside 95% CIs. Qualitative data from patients will undergo thematic analysis, and stakeholder interviews will be coded using Normalisation Process Theory. An early health economic model will be developed to explore resource use, costs and proportions of appropriate and timely antibiotic use between current pathways and a proposed pathway, including self-swabbing. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: West of Scotland Research Ethics Service has reviewed and approved the study (REC reference: 25/WS/0079). Findings will be disseminated through the study website, a webinar, peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, patient and public involvement-led activities and engagement with National Health Service (NHS) stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT07200401, ISRCTN28466609.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresSelf CareSurgical Wound InfectionAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansUnited KingdomFeasibility StudiesMICROBIOLOGYSelf-ManagementSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID41667168
PMCPMC12911688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.