Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41667165›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Longitudinal study of childbirth readiness and its related factors and consequences among low-risk pregnant women attending health centres in Tabriz, Iran.

Zohreh Alizadeh-Dibazari, Fatemeh Abbasalizadeh, Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, Mojgan Mirghafourvand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zohreh Alizadeh-DibazariDepartment of Midwifery, TaMS.C, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-1372
Fatemeh AbbasalizadehWomen Reproductive Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).
Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-CharandabiMidwifery Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (the Islamic Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-9333
Mojgan MirghafourvandSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (the Islamic Republic of) mirghafourvand@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8360-4309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChildbirth readiness can reflect women's childbirth readiness in terms of knowledge, psychological aspects and planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate childbirth readiness, its related factors and consequences in Iranian pregnant women.

designThis longitudinal study was the first stage (quantitative stage) of a sequential explanatory mixed-method study. It followed women during late pregnancy (from 37 weeks of gestation) and the postpartum period (4-6 weeks after childbirth) from March to September 2023.

settingHealth centres of Tabriz, Iran.

participantsThis study involved 360 pregnant women with a gestational age of 37 weeks and above, selected via cluster sampling. Participants were excluded for high-risk pregnancies, unfavourable incidents in the last 3 months, mental-psychological diseases or a prior caesarean section. OUTCOME MEASURES: Childbirth readiness and its related factors were assessed using several instruments completed from the 37th week of pregnancy onward, including the Childbirth Readiness Scale, a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Pregnancy Experience Scale and the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire Version A. The consequences of childbirth readiness were then evaluated 4-6 weeks post partum using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Postpartum-Specific Anxiety Scale.

resultsThe mean (SD) childbirth readiness score was 67.83 (9.41) out of 90. In the adjusted general linear model (GLM), several factors were significantly associated with lower readiness. These included a higher fear of childbirth score (β -0.12, 95% CI -0.16 to -0.08, p<0.001), first pregnancy (β -5.84, 95% CI -9.71 to -1.96, p=0.003), nulliparity (β -12.50, 95% CI -15.95 to -9.05, p<0.001), no history of abortion (β -2.90, 95% CI -5.42 to -0.43, p=0.021), non-participation in readiness classes (β -2.24, 95% CI -4.41 to -0.08, p=0.042), lower educational attainment (β -4.55, 95% CI -7.60 to -1.50, p=0.004) and having a husband who was a worker (β -2.07, 95% CI -3.87 to -0.28, p=0.023). In contrast, being a homeowner was associated with a higher readiness score (β 2.14, 95% CI 0.05 to 4.24, p=0.045). Based on GLM, pregnancy experience was not significantly associated with childbirth readiness, and childbirth readiness was not significantly associated with childbirth experience or postpartum anxiety.

conclusionsKey factors associated with readiness included fear of childbirth, obstetric history (gravidity, parity, history of abortion and participation in childbirth readiness classes), maternal education, home ownership, husband's occupation-though several associations showed small effect sizes. After adjustment, readiness did not independently predict childbirth experience or postpartum mental health. The low participation rate in readiness courses highlights a major service gap. Integrating readiness assessment into prenatal care and expanding access to targeted education are recommended to improve outcomes such as birth satisfaction and caesarean rates.

Indexed as

ParturitionPregnant PeopleAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIranLongitudinal StudiesPostpartum PeriodPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultNatural ChildbirthPostpartum WomenPregnant Women

Identifiers

PMID41667165
PMCPMC12911837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.