ArticleClinical practice and cases in emergency medicine2026
Implanted in the Scar: A Case Report of Diagnosis and Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy.
Article in Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEctopic pregnancy is a serious pregnancy complication that occurs when a gestational sac implants outside the uterus, most commonly in the fallopian tubes. However, a rare form of ectopic pregnancy, the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, occurs within a prior cesarean section scar and is becoming more common as cesarean delivery rates continue to rise. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies are challenging to diagnose and pose significant risks, including rupture and hemorrhage, which can lead to maternal death. CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a 16-day history of abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding, initially believed to be her menstrual period. She had a history of one previous lower uterine segment cesarean section. On examination, her beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels were elevated, and transvaginal ultrasound revealed an empty uterus with a gestational sac within a cystic area of the cesarean scar. The patient was diagnosed with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Given the high rupture risk, she underwent laparoscopic surgery with dilation and curettage. Postoperative management included methotrexate, antibiotics, and analgesics. A follow-up β-hCG test showed a significant decline, confirming resolution of the ectopic pregnancy. At her two-week follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic with no bleeding, and ultrasound confirmed no retained products of conception.
conclusionCesarean scar ectopic pregnancies are a rare and life-threatening complication of pregnancy that require timely diagnosis and intervention. Early detection through transvaginal ultrasound and appropriate multidisciplinary management are critical to prevent adverse outcomes. This case highlights the importance of early recognition, classification, surgical decision-making, and standardized diagnostic protocols to improve outcomes and save lives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.