Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41666865›Full record

ReviewNeurospine2026

Socioeconomic Implications of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Narrative Review.

Rachel Bratescu, Anthony Robayo, Evan Wang, Chibuikem A Ikwuegbuenyi, Lawrance K Chung, Noah Willett, Andreas K Demetriades, Sun-Ho Lee, Roger Härtl, AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurospine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rachel BratescuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA.
Anthony RobayoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Evan WangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Chibuikem A IkwuegbuenyiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Lawrance K ChungDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Noah WillettDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Andreas K DemetriadesEdinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sun-Ho LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Roger HärtlDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is a common complication after discectomy, occurring in 2%-25% of patients and contributing to higher reoperation rates, reduced satisfaction, and substantial direct and indirect costs. This review evaluates the economic consequences of RLDH and the relative cost-effectiveness of available management strategies. A systematic search of OVID, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library was performed through August 2025. Peer-reviewed, English-language studies were included if they examined adults (≥18 years) with RLDH and reported economic data. Exclusion criteria were studies limited to primary, cervical, or thoracic herniations; animal or cadaveric models; and abstracts. Extracted variables included study design, sample size, follow-up duration, and cost components. Of 283 records identified, 220 were screened and 35 underwent full-text review. Six studies met inclusion criteria, with 2 added through citation searching. Reported costs varied considerably: repeat discectomy added $6,907 in one analysis, while fusion increased expenses by more than 350%. Across studies, repeat discectomy remained the most cost-efficient option, providing comparable outcomes with reduced perioperative expenditures. Conservative management had the lowest immediate direct costs (≈$2,300) but likely underestimates the overall burden due to unmeasured productivity losses. Annular closure devices demonstrated potential cost savings of $2,000-5,000 over 2-5 years. RLDH imposes a substantial economic burden. Heterogeneity in costing methods remains a major limitation which hinders evidence-based determinations. Greater transparency, methodological standardization, and incorporation of societal perspectives are essential to accurately assess the socioeconomic impact of RLDH.

Indexed as

Costs and cost analysisIntervertebral disc displacementQuality of lifeReoperation

Identifiers

PMID41666865
PMCPMC12890384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.