ArticleNeurospine2026
Preoperative Clinical and Radiographic Risk Factors for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Neurospine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for residual low back pain at twelve months after low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation in lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective cohort study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Comparison of clinical efficacy and minimal invasiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Albumin and Prealbumin in Predicting Adverse Events After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- A Commentary on "Preoperative Clinical and Radiographic Risk Factors for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis".Neurospine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLumbar discectomy is one of the most frequently undertaken procedures for the management of lumbar disc herniation. However, it may be complicated by recurrent disc herniation, with reported rates as high as 25%. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the largest systematic review to date, analyzing the clinical and radiographic risk factors for recurrent disc herniation.
methodsA systematic literature search of Embase and PubMed/Medline, covering the period from inception to October 1, 2025, was conducted to identify case-control or cohort studies reporting risk factors for recurrent disc herniation. Risk factors were classified into baseline, clinical, and radiographic risk factors. Meta-analysis was performed for any reported risk factor with data from 3 or more studies. The assessment included an evaluation of publication bias and heterogeneity.
resultsA total of 51 studies published during the search timeframe, comprising 52,479 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Recurrent disc herniation occurred in 6,794 patients (12.9%). Significant risk factors for disc herniation included high body mass index (BMI) (standard mean difference [SMD], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.70), diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.23-1.77), increased sagittal range of motion (SMD, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.35-3.94), and Modic changes (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.20-4.01). No other significant predictors for recurrent disc herniation were identified.
conclusionIn conclusion, patients with high BMI, diabetics, increased sagittal range of motion, and presence of Modic changes are at increased risk of recurrent disc herniation. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the risk factors identified in this study associated with recurrent disc herniation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.