ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2026
A Pilot Feasibility Study of a Home Tablet-Based Neurorehabilitation Program and Serial Brain Vital Sign Monitoring for Survivors of Pediatric Cerebral Malaria.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lasting sequelae are identified in 50% of child survivors of cerebral malaria (CM). Rehabilitation options in malaria-endemic regions are scarce and largely focused on physical deficits, leaving children without support for cognitive recovery. Effective and accessible interventions are vital for improving outcomes. Furthermore, the assessment of brain function and recovery after CM is dependent on behavior-based tests that are time-consuming and require substantial training to administer. Objective, easy-to-use alternatives may be impactful. Children aged 3-12 years who had survived CM were recruited. Participants underwent a 6-month in-home, tablet-based neurorehabilitation program called Dino Island (DI). Participants also underwent serial assessments of brain health that were conducted by measuring event-related potentials (ERPs) using the Brain Vital Signs system. The feasibility, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness, and affordability of the interventions were evaluated through interviews with the study nurses and the participants' families. Both programs were feasible and easy to implement. Acceptability was demonstrated by low attrition rates (5%) and positive family ratings (100%). Appropriateness for DI was confirmed by parent reports of positive behavioral changes in their children (60%). For Brain Vital Signs, appropriateness was confirmed by adequate data acquisition for most participants. Finally, positive indicators of affordability from a healthcare perspective were identified. Neurorehabilitation using a home tablet-based program and objective brain health assessment using ERPs was feasible, well accepted, and appropriate in child CM survivors in sub-Saharan Africa. Further development and research into the program's ability to improve and measure cognitive recovery is justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.