ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
A framework for evaluating predicted sperm trajectories in crowded microscopy videos.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the 1980s, semi-automated sperm motility analysis of phase contrast microscopy videos has been used to measure and categorize sperm motility patterns. Motility categories are determined from various kinematic parameters such as Curvilinear Velocity (VCL) and Beat Cross Frequency (BCF). These measures ultimately rely on the quality of the tracking for each individual sperm in the microscopy video. However, common approaches to sperm tracking require sample dilution and shortening the time window of observation (less than 1 to 2 seconds) to avoid tracking errors that occur when sperm cross paths. The post-ejaculatory lifespan of sperm can exceed several hours to days in some species, and long-term adaptive changes in motility pattern may be an important distinguishing factor for predictive modeling of sperm fertilizing competence. Improving the predictive value of computer assisted semen analysis will require accurate tracking of sperm trajectories over physiologically-relevant time scales and at the high cell densities typically found in semen. In this work, we identify a framework for accurately assessing the quality of sperm trajectory tracking that is independent of standard motility measures. We utilize cell tracking metrics adapted from the more common task of tracking adherent somatic cells and propose modifications based on the unique challenges of sperm video-microscopy. We also provide a small dataset of microscopy videos that includes 340 labeled sperm trajectories to allow for future comparisons and developments. Finally, we demonstrate that variations in configuration can lead to as much as a 30% improvement on metrics, showcasing their effectiveness at analyzing tracking quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.