ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Determining the Validity of a New Speech Perception Test for Toddlers With and Without Hearing Loss.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSpeech perception skills are foundational to language development and highly variable among children who are deaf and hard of hearing (D/HH), making the assessment of speech perception skills critical for understanding and nurturing language development in D/HH children. However, commonly used assessment tools of speech perception may not be valid measures for young children because they depend on children's vocabulary skills. To address this challenge, a new speech perception test was recently developed-the Toddler Speech Perception Test (TSPT)-a two-alternative forced-choice picture-pointing task that involves only words that most toddlers produce by 2.5 years of age.
methodThis study evaluated the validity of the TSPT by analyzing the performance of 32 D/HH and 21 typically hearing (TH) 2.5-year-olds and determining if their performance was consistent with what would be expected of a test that assessed speech perception skills rather than language comprehension. Specifically, performance was compared to measures of vocabulary, total language, auditory functioning skills, and hearing thresholds. Internal validity was assessed by comparing performance of phonologically similar word contrasts with performance on more dissimilar contrasts. Reliability was assessed using the split-halves method.
resultsThe results demonstrated expected correlations with other measures, good internal validity, and good reliability with some differences between the TH and D/HH groups.
conclusionsOverall, the findings suggest that the TSPT is a valid measure of speech perception, especially in children who are D/HH. Limitations and future directions are discussed with the aim of advancing scientific rigor of speech perception testing in young D/HH children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.