ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluating the effectiveness of preservice midwifery curricula in Ethiopia: A comparison of neonatal resuscitation and infection prevention practice of midwifery graduates trained in competency-based versus conventional curricula.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfection control and neonatal resuscitation are essential midwifery practices that can reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. However, in Ethiopia, theory-heavy midwifery education leads to limited clinical competence. To address this, Debre Tabor University implemented a competency-based curriculum in 2013. This study examines whether competency-based midwifery education produces graduates with significantly better performance in neonatal resuscitation and infection prevention compared to conventional education, thereby framing a testable argument about the curriculum's effectiveness.
methodsA comparative cross-sectional study assessed the infection prevention and neonatal resuscitation performance of 68 BSc midwifery graduates (32 competency-based vs. 36 conventional) from third-generation Ethiopian universities. Performance was measured using a validated observation tool in clinical settings for infection prevention and simulations for neonatal resuscitation. Mean percentage scores were compared using t-tests, with effect size illustrated via Gardner-Altman plots.
resultsOverall, midwives demonstrated 63.6% of essential neonatal resuscitation tasks, with competency-based curriculum graduates (CBCGs) having higher performance than conventional curriculum graduates (CCGs) (71.6% vs. 56.5%; t (66.0) = 3.82, p < .001; difference = 15.1%), particularly in airway suctioning and chest rise assessment. For infection prevention, midwives performed 71.7% of the required tasks, with CBCGs again scoring higher (76.9% vs. 67.0%; t (55.4) = 2.79, p < .01; difference = 9.9%). Key differences were observed in hand hygiene, the use of personal protective equipment, and apron decontamination. Despite these improvements, persistent deficiencies remained in both groups, particularly in checking breathing/pulse during neonatal resuscitation and in disinfecting aprons during infection prevention practices.
conclusionsCBCGs demonstrated better performance in neonatal resuscitation and infection prevention compared to those from the conventional program, suggesting clinical relevance. However, performance gaps in both groups underscore the need for enhanced simulation training, ongoing skill reinforcement, and curriculum refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.