Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41666168›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Beyond traditional stimuli: Validating AI-generated images for eliciting negative emotions in affect research.

Hey Tou Chiu, Hoi In Sou, Yuen Wing Lam, Clayton Siu Fung Ng, Savio W H Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The "synthetic validity" problem in AI-generated science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hey Tou ChiuDepartment of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2244-0288
Hoi In SouDepartment of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Yuen Wing LamDepartment of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Clayton Siu Fung NgLaboratory for Brain and Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Savio W H WongDepartment of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2854-5830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of emotion often rely on standardized stimulus sets to elicit affective responses. Although established databases provide images with normative valence and arousal ratings, selecting suitable stimuli can be difficult when experiments require specific thematic or content constraints. This challenge is especially pronounced for negative stimuli, which are central to research on maladaptive emotions and behaviors in clinical contexts but are often scarce in necessary quantity or specificity. The present study evaluated the feasibility of using generative AI, specifically text-to-image generators, to create tailored negative and neutral affective stimuli. To assess whether these images can serve as alternatives to traditional stimuli, we compared their affective properties to those reported in standardized image databases. Across two studies, participants rated the valence and arousal of 160 and 200 AI-generated images. Our findings revealed that AI-generated negative and neutral images reproduced the characteristic inverse association between valence and arousal observed in standardized databases, with moderate to strong correlations between these dimensions. These results highlight the potential of generative AI as a practical methodological tool for creating customized affective stimuli aligned with specific research objectives and experimental designs.

Indexed as

AffectEmotionsArousalFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMalePhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41666168
PMCPMC12890096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.